l i n u x - u s e r s - g r o u p - o f - d a v i s
L U G O D
 
Next Meeting:
December 2: Social Gathering
Next Installfest:
TBA
Latest News:
Nov. 18: Officers elected
Page last updated:
2007 Jan 19 12:23
Events
 Meetings
 Installfests
 Demos
 Photos
Services
 Library
 LERT
 Jobs
 Documents
Interact
 Mailing Lists
 - Search
 - Archives
 Chat (IRC)
 Social Networks
About Us
 Members
 Projects
 Testimonials
 Call for Speakers
 Why Not MS?
 Finances
 Sponsors

^Home
?Search
?News & RSS
?Calendar
@Contact Us
$Buy Stuff
=Printable


The following is an archive of a post made to our 'vox mailing list' by one of its subscribers.

Report this post as spam:

(Enter your email address)
Re: [vox] Iceweasel
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vox] Iceweasel



It boils down to two things.  One, Debian almost always does *extra*
things, which is one of the things that makes Debian so good.  They fix
bugs, they tweak the install to be more robust (or shall we say 'more well
behaved').  Debian always submits useful changes back to the upstream
source.  Two, Mozilla, rightly so, doesn't want Firefox *plus* Debian's
bugfixes and tweaks called "FireFox".  Mozilla doesn't necessarily agree
with all of Debian's bugfixes and tweeks, so they've not take then into
their source.  So you have an impasse.  Debian adds value by fixing bugs
and tweaking things and Mozilla is saying if you do that, it's not Firefox
any more.

So debian adds a renamed logo and name, s/Firefox/Iceweasel/.  So what?  I
prefer Debian's packaging anyway, and Debian almost always does the right
thing.

I think both Debian and Mozilla have their points, and neither is wrong.
It's sad that a happier solution hasn't been found, but it's not a big
deal.

On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 09:55:36AM -0800, Bob Scofield wrote:
> I was looking forward to Firefox 2.0, and today Apt said it was going to 
> download it.  But voila, out came Iceweasel.
> 
> I'm always the last to find out about tech stuff, and I may have missed a 
> discussion here.  If so, I apologize for asking about it now.
> 
> I've read a little bit about the Mozilla/Debian "controversy?" on Wikipedia, 
> and will read more when I get the time.  I'm just writing this so that I can 
> learn more about what people here think about it.  So if anyone has an 
> opinion, I'd like to hear it.
> 
> I'm assuming that if I were using Apt on Fedora or Kubuntu or Open Suse I 
> would have gotten Firefox instead of Iceweasel, right?
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Bob
> _______________________________________________
> vox mailing list
> vox@lists.lugod.org
> http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox

-- 
Ted Deppner
http://www.deppner.us/
_______________________________________________
vox mailing list
vox@lists.lugod.org
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox



LinkedIn
LUGOD Group on LinkedIn
facebook
LUGOD Group on Facebook

Hosting provided by:
Sunset Systems
Sunset Systems offers preconfigured Linux systems, remote system administration and custom software development.

LUGOD: Linux Users' Group of Davis
1105 Kennedy Place, Suite 1, Davis, CA 95616
Contact Us

LUGOD is a 501(c)7 non-profit organization
based in Davis, California
and serving the Sacramento area.
"Linux" is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Sponsored in part by:
Marc Hall
For a generous donation to allow us to continue meeting at the Davis Library.