l i n u x - u s e r s - g r o u p - o f - d a v i s
L U G O D
 
Next Meeting:
December 2: Social Gathering
Next Installfest:
TBA
Latest News:
Nov. 18: Officers elected
Page last updated:
2005 Feb 14 01:39
Events
 Meetings
 Installfests
 Demos
 Photos
Services
 Library
 LERT
 Jobs
 Documents
Interact
 Mailing Lists
 - Search
 - Archives
 Chat (IRC)
 Social Networks
About Us
 Members
 Projects
 Testimonials
 Call for Speakers
 Why Not MS?
 Finances
 Sponsors

^Home
?Search
?News & RSS
?Calendar
@Contact Us
$Buy Stuff
=Printable


The following is an archive of a post made to our 'vox mailing list' by one of its subscribers.

Report this post as spam:

(Enter your email address)
[vox] For MSFT page: Opera CTO notes interoperability issues
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[vox] For MSFT page: Opera CTO notes interoperability issues



One of Microsoft's current FUD tacks is the "interoperability" chimera.

Funny, that.

It appears that there are, um, certain issues with Microsoft's ability
to interoperate on, say, a standards-based medium like the World Wide
Web.

Opera's CTO, Hakon Lie, has a *very* nice laundry list at The Register
on interop issues:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/11/hakon_on_ms_interroperability/

    Opera to MS: Get real about interoperability, Mr Gates
    By Hakon Lie
    Published Friday 11th February 2005 18:00 GMT

    Last week Bill Gates got the interoperability religion. Allegedly -
    given Microsoft's long and sometimes less than constructive history
    in the field of interoperability, a certain amount of scepticism is
    perhaps appropriate. Hakon Lie, Chief Technology Officer of
    long-standing Microsoft competitor Opera Software, welcomes Gates'
    new-found enthusiasm for interoperability, but in the following
    response to Gates, has just a few suggestions about what Microsoft
    might do to actually achieve it.

    So, Mr. Gates, writes Hakon Lie, you say you believe in
    interoperability. Then why, pray tell, doesn't the web page of your
    interoperability communiqué conform to the HTML4 standard as it
    claims to? Why does the W3C validator diagnose 126 errors on your
    page?

    You say you believe in interoperability. Then why is your document
    served in different versions to different browsers? Why does your
    server sniff out the Opera browser and send it different style
    sheets from the ones you send to Microsoft's own Internet Explorer
    (WinIE)? As a result, Opera renders the page differently.

    You say you believe in interoperability. Why does the Hotmail
    service deny Opera access to the same scripts as Microsoft's own
    browser? As a result, Opera users can't delete junk mail.

    <...>

Nice summary of some very major, and apparently highly deliberate,
noninteroperablity issues.


Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
    < zignig> def : debiant, a subversive gnu/linux user

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
vox mailing list
vox@lists.lugod.org
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox


LinkedIn
LUGOD Group on LinkedIn
facebook
LUGOD Group on Facebook

Hosting provided by:
Sunset Systems
Sunset Systems offers preconfigured Linux systems, remote system administration and custom software development.

LUGOD: Linux Users' Group of Davis
1105 Kennedy Place, Suite 1, Davis, CA 95616
Contact Us

LUGOD is a 501(c)7 non-profit organization
based in Davis, California
and serving the Sacramento area.
"Linux" is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Sponsored in part by:
Appahost Applications
For a significant contribution towards our projector, and a generous donation to allow us to continue meeting at the Davis Library.