Re: [vox] orkut is evil

["Karsten M. Self" <kmself@ix.nMAPSetcom.com>]

on Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 03:27:56PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman (p@dirac.org) wrote:
> just in case there are people who haven't seen it yet:
> 
> 
>    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/35375.html
> 
> 
> do a google search.  you'll find some interesting stuff about orkut
> (and, unfortunately, google).

Orlowski somewhat has it in for Google, though I'm not always sure what
his gripe is.

The  other quote he tossed out a few days back was:

    People really aren't going to trust them if they view these
    start-ups as honeypots for future marketroids to reap everything we
    didn't want them to know. Let alone allow a passing hacker to scarf
    up this potential archive of great exploitable value. 
    -- Andrew Orlowski, on Orkut, Friendster, and ilk.

(from my .sig rotation).  Given that I've worked in some pretty spooky
data collection systems, I try to avoid them where I can.


Still, I can't figure out for the life of me why they didn't call it...


   .
   .
   .











   .
   .
   .











   .
   .
   .











   .
   .
   .




... Go'ogle

;-)


Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
    Linux: Good, fast, _and_ cheap.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature