l i n u x - u s e r s - g r o u p - o f - d a v i s
Next Meeting:
July 7: Social gathering
Next Installfest:
Latest News:
Jun. 14: June LUGOD meeting cancelled
Page last updated:
2004 Jan 02 14:54

The following is an archive of a post made to our 'vox mailing list' by one of its subscribers.

Report this post as spam:

(Enter your email address)
Re: [vox] Self-replying [Was "XFree86 Core Team Disbands" (?)]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vox] Self-replying [Was "XFree86 Core Team Disbands" (?)]

Jeff Newmiller wrote:

> On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, Tim Riley wrote:
> > ME wrote:
> >
> > > Look! My (lack of) nettiquette is showing:
> > > (replying to myself)
> >
> > Why is adding an additional thought after pressing the <send>
> > button bad nettiquette?
> I can think of two reasons off the top of my head:
> a) pushing the send button too quick is something to be frowned upon... it
> suggests that you do not respect your readers' time spent interpreting
> your thoughts.  Specifically, having to thread two messages together to
> identify a complete thought may not always be possible, since related
> messages may not always be presented together.
> b) if your audience is so uninterested in your topic that there is no one
> else to reply to after your message, then perhaps you shouldn't be talking
> to yourself on that topic in that forum.

These are two good reasons; however, there may be more. If you
think of one, feel free to post it.

Tim "complete-stop-only-if-approaching-cars-or-onlooking-cop" Riley


Sorry for the snide remark -- couldn't resist ;-)

I think your point that no one is interested in uninformative postings is
valid. Moreover, thinking before pressing the <send> button is prudent
when trying to minimize uninformative postings. However, this is
independent of whether or not it occurs as a self-reply.

If someone tries to help solve a problem of mine by first
responding from the gut, second thinking about it, and finally solving it, then

I'm not going to complain if he/she's the only respondent. Nor should
I feel guilty (and compelled to apologize) for doing the same.

Tim "still-trying-to-change-the-world" Riley

> I don't think either of these sufficient justification to condemn someone
> for replying to themselves once in awhile, but I do think they at least
> suggest that doing so should be a rare event.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jeff Newmiller                        The     .....       .....  Go Live...
> DCN:<jdnewmil@dcn.davis.ca.us>        Basics: ##.#.       ##.#.  Live Go...
>                                       Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
> Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries            O.O#.       #.O#.  with
> /Software/Embedded Controllers)               .OO#.       .OO#.  rocks...2k
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> vox mailing list
> vox@lists.lugod.org
> http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox

vox mailing list

LUGOD Group on LinkedIn
Sign up for LUGOD event announcements
Your email address:
LUGOD Group on Facebook
'Like' LUGOD on Facebook:

Hosting provided by:
Sunset Systems
Sunset Systems offers preconfigured Linux systems, remote system administration and custom software development.

LUGOD: Linux Users' Group of Davis
PO Box 2082, Davis, CA 95617
Contact Us

LUGOD is a 501(c)7 non-profit organization
based in Davis, California
and serving the Sacramento area.
"Linux" is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Sponsored in part by:
O'Reilly and Associates
For numerous book donations.