l i n u x - u s e r s - g r o u p - o f - d a v i s
L U G O D
 
Next Meeting:
January 6: Social gathering
Next Installfest:
TBD
Latest News:
Nov. 18: Club officer elections
Page last updated:
2009 Jun 23 19:55

The following is an archive of a post made to our 'vox-tech mailing list' by one of its subscribers.

Report this post as spam:

(Enter your email address)
Re: [vox-tech] Need Partitioning Advice
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vox-tech] Need Partitioning Advice



Quoting Bill Broadley (bill@cse.ucdavis.edu):

> [...] I think it's a particularly bad idea to as Karsten's page says
> make the basic recommendation for 6 partitions.  If you read his page
> it looks like he's pretty strong on /boot and swap partitions as well.  
                                      ^^^^^

This is factually incorrect.  As Karsten said, you seem to be imputing
rather than reading.

[skipping most:]

> The flip side is that it requires specialized knowledge (quick, what's
> the optimal /var, /usr, /usr/local for a particular distribution? )
> that's often basically unknowable.

And yet a trained monkey can do "df -h" on a similar installed system,
to guesstimate the target requirement for the system's projected life.

> So what use case adds security by using noexec if /tmp is world
> readable and mounted with exec?

Karsten answered this question, as did I -- and neither of us indulged the
overinflated expectations that the phrase "add security" (your phrase) tends
to introduce into a conversation.


> The page also makes a few mentioned of ro, seems a bit silly.  So if
> only root can write to /usr, and root can remount rw what are you
> protection from?

In short:  yourself.  It's saved me from shooting myself in the foot 
quite a number of times.  Once again, both Karsten and I already
addressed this point, so your posing the question yet again seems to be
solely polemics.

> Sure things like putting /tmp on a ram disk sounds like a great idea,

Again this was _not_ among Karsten's recommendations.

> > You'd rather provide an explicit and laundry list of directories (that
> > must then be maintained), when just adding "-x" (don't cross filesystem
> > boundaries) to your rsync command solves that problem entirely?  Really?
> 
> Er, yes.

Good luck with that.  I think my point is self-explanatory.

> In any case, by crude partition based backups I meant things like dump
> restore vs [...]

More straw-man argumentation, as Karsten made no such recommendation.

I really will skip the rest.
_______________________________________________
vox-tech mailing list
vox-tech@lists.lugod.org
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech



LinkedIn
LUGOD Group on LinkedIn
Sign up for LUGOD event announcements
Your email address:
facebook
LUGOD Group on Facebook
'Like' LUGOD on Facebook:

Hosting provided by:
Sunset Systems
Sunset Systems offers preconfigured Linux systems, remote system administration and custom software development.

LUGOD: Linux Users' Group of Davis
PO Box 2082, Davis, CA 95617
Contact Us

LUGOD is a 501(c)7 non-profit organization
based in Davis, California
and serving the Sacramento area.
"Linux" is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Sponsored in part by:
O'Reilly and Associates
For numerous book donations.