l i n u x - u s e r s - g r o u p - o f - d a v i s
L U G O D
 
Next Meeting:
December 2: Social Gathering
Next Installfest:
TBA
Latest News:
Nov. 18: Officers elected
Page last updated:
2006 Mar 31 12:40
Events
 Meetings
 Installfests
 Demos
 Photos
Services
 Library
 LERT
 Jobs
 Documents
Interact
 Mailing Lists
 - Search
 - Archives
 Chat (IRC)
 Social Networks
About Us
 Members
 Projects
 Testimonials
 Call for Speakers
 Why Not MS?
 Finances
 Sponsors

^Home
?Search
?News & RSS
?Calendar
@Contact Us
$Buy Stuff
=Printable


The following is an archive of a post made to our 'vox-tech mailing list' by one of its subscribers.

Report this post as spam:

(Enter your email address)
Re: [vox-tech] Etch sources.list
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vox-tech] Etch sources.list



I think the point is that no matter which level you run, you do
need to be aware of what version you are actually running. I had
my system pointed at "testing" for some time. Then it became stable.
And testing, which had been sarge was now etch. I started having
strange failures when I tried to update my software. The solution
was to set my sources.list to "sarge", do a full upgrade to make sure
I had the released version of sarge, then change to etch and do another
upgrade. The way Debian is suggesting means that when they
make the switch you won't have any weirdness although you'll
be down revision from where you want to be ( something easily
fixed) Either way, you need to be aware of when a new stable
is released.

Richard

On Wed March 29 2006 22:23, Bob Scofield wrote:
> I'm doing some thinking and planning for my upcoming Debian install, and
> came across this from the Debian website:
>
>  "The installer will set up /etc/apt/sources.list for the installed system
> using the codename (etch) rather than the suite (testing) of the release
> being installed."
>
> Doesn't this take the fun out of Debian?  If I understand things correctly,
> this will get the user into a system that will someday be "frozen"; Debian
> stable.  Why would a desktop user ever want to run stable?
>
> So here's my plan.  When I download Etch I'm going to copy my present
> sources.list into the download.  It is set up for "testing".  It started
> out as Sarge and is now Etch.  Isn't this the smart thing for a desktop
> (non server) user to do?  This gets all the KDE, Open Office, Firebird
> upgrades forever.  I wonder why Debian is channeling people into stable (a
> dead end). Am I missing something?
>
> Bob
> _______________________________________________
> vox-tech mailing list
> vox-tech@lists.lugod.org
> http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
_______________________________________________
vox-tech mailing list
vox-tech@lists.lugod.org
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech



LinkedIn
LUGOD Group on LinkedIn
facebook
LUGOD Group on Facebook

Hosting provided by:
Sunset Systems
Sunset Systems offers preconfigured Linux systems, remote system administration and custom software development.

LUGOD: Linux Users' Group of Davis
1105 Kennedy Place, Suite 1, Davis, CA 95616
Contact Us

LUGOD is a 501(c)7 non-profit organization
based in Davis, California
and serving the Sacramento area.
"Linux" is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Sponsored in part by:
No Starch Press
For book donations.