l i n u x - u s e r s - g r o u p - o f - d a v i s
Next Meeting:
July 7: Social gathering
Next Installfest:
Latest News:
Jun. 14: June LUGOD meeting cancelled
Page last updated:
2005 May 29 00:26

The following is an archive of a post made to our 'vox-tech mailing list' by one of its subscribers.

Report this post as spam:

(Enter your email address)
Re: [vox-tech] collaborative writing with latex
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vox-tech] collaborative writing with latex

on Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:47:37PM -0700, Dylan Beaudette (dylan@iici.no-ip.org) wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> A colleague and I were recently talking about adopting LATEX as the
> format for dissertations and publications and the like, but always
> came up against a problem: collaborative writting efforts.
> While it is ok for me to write all of my stuff in LATEX, sharing an
> editable, electronic version becomes complicated when working with
> others who have no interest in using LATEX as well. This is probably
> why M$ word is so widespread in this dept. 

It's not a particularly good format for this, it's just widely
distributed.  I'll echo Henry's suggestion for using DocBook, for which
plugins exist for a number of authoring tools, including those by that
company that pressed charges against Dmitry Sklyarov for identifying its
broken digital restrictions management implmentation.  Not sure if MSFT
products are supported....

A minute or so with Google shows a number of possibilities, including
plugins for Our Name Is Mud software, antiword's option to output
DocBook format, and the DocBook Wiki.


> We came up with a couple possible solutions consisting of sending
> parts to be checked in RTF or text format, while keeping the original
> in LATEX. This of course is not always a very feasible option, as
> collaborators often want to see and work with the entire manuscript
> with figures. 

My suggestion would be to use a format for document interchange, then
merge back to LaTeX (or other format) as needed.  From the LaTeX
sources, you can generate PS/PDF output, which may meet your needs for
distributing a full manuscript-to-date, though not in a directly
editable format.

There are tools to convert _to_ RTF from HTML or LaTeX sources, which
may address some issues of interchange.  RTF itself is a parseable
text-based format which may provide sufficient formetting context to 
> Does anyone know of any existing methods of doing one's writting in
> LATEX, with the option of making it available for edits to others not
> using LATEX? 

Yet another option is to use one of the online collaborative authoring
tools, of which Drupal is one option.  It has a "book" mode in which
multiple users can edit text for assembly into book format.  I haven't
looked at this in depth, but it piqued my interest:


Looks like it's best suited to online materials, but again:
well-structured HTML should be amenable to conversion to other formats.
I use a system to manage a document maintained in HTML and automatically
output to text, PS, PDF, and DOC (well, really RTF) formats, using shell


Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
   LNX-BBC:  Bootable GNU/Linux -- Don't leave /home without it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

vox-tech mailing list

LUGOD Group on LinkedIn
Sign up for LUGOD event announcements
Your email address:
LUGOD Group on Facebook
'Like' LUGOD on Facebook:

Hosting provided by:
Sunset Systems
Sunset Systems offers preconfigured Linux systems, remote system administration and custom software development.

LUGOD: Linux Users' Group of Davis
PO Box 2082, Davis, CA 95617
Contact Us

LUGOD is a 501(c)7 non-profit organization
based in Davis, California
and serving the Sacramento area.
"Linux" is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Sponsored in part by:
O'Reilly and Associates
For numerous book donations.