l i n u x - u s e r s - g r o u p - o f - d a v i s
L U G O D
 
Next Meeting:
September 2: Social Gathering
Next Installfest:
Sat. Sept. 27, 10am-6pm [Tentative]
Latest News:
Aug. 19: Siafoo slides and photos online
Page last updated:
2002 Jun 04 16:40
Events
 Meetings
 Installfests
 Demos
 Photos
Services
 Library
 LERT
 Jobs
 Documents
Interact
 Mailing Lists
 - Search
 - Archives
 Chat
About Us
 Members
 Projects
 Testimonials
 Call for Speakers
 Why Not MS?
 Finances
 Sponsors

^Home
?Search
?News & RSS
?Calendar
@Contact Us
$Buy Stuff
=Printable


The following is an archive of a post made to our 'vox-tech mailing list' by one of its subscribers.

Report this post as spam:

(Enter your email address)
Re: [vox-tech] tar question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vox-tech] tar question



begin Shawn P. Neugebauer <spn@ucdavis.edu> 
> On Tuesday 04 June 2002 02:23 pm, you wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 June 2002 12:54 pm, you wrote:
> >
> > > it _sucks royally_ that tar seems to destroy the archive when you delete
> > > an unknown file:
> > >
> > >    p@satan% file test.tar
> > >    test.tar: GNU tar archive
> > >    p@satan% tar f test.tar --delete "test/biteme"
> > >    tar: test/biteme: Not found in archive
> > >    tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
> > >    p@satan% file test.tar
> > >    test.tar: data
> >
> > it also deletes the archive if you don't list a file (or files).  yes, this
> > is weird and were it not consistent i would call it a bug, but it's
> > probably some kind of "feature."
> 
> well, this *is* a bug!  i noticed it when testing stuff to answer pete's
> question, but ignored it.  then we pete mentioned it again, i started
> poking around.  can't find any mention of it anywhere.  however, the
> tar man/info page at gnu.org says
>   "if you list no member names, nothing will be deleted"
> and this is clearly violated.  as pete noticed, it also destroys the
> archive if a member name is not actually a member.
> 
> i reported this to bugzilla.redhat.com for version 7.1 and got a
> quick reply that "it works in 7.3."  however, i just tested it with 7.3
> and it's broken there, too; i added a comment to this.
> 
> FYI, this is tar-1.13.19-4 on RH 7.1 and tar-1.13.25-4 on RH 7.3.
 
i filed a bug report with debian about an hour ago.  hopefully it'll
find its way upstream.

i'm shocked that the bug exists.  you'd think that someone, somewhere
would've stumbled across this data corruption bug and reported it.

guess not too many people use the --delete option!   prolly because it's
so unintuitive.  or maybe people just got tired of having their archives
corrupted.   lol!  :-)

i'll post any results i get from the debian tar package manager.

pete
_______________________________________________
vox-tech mailing list
vox-tech@lists.lugod.org
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech



Hosting provided by:
Sunset Systems
Sunset Systems offers preconfigured Linux systems, remote system administration and custom software development.

CD Burns Wanted!

LUGOD: Linux Users' Group of Davis
1105 Kennedy Place, Suite 1, Davis, CA 95616
Contact Us

LUGOD is a 501(c)7 non-profit organization
based in Davis, California
and serving the Sacramento area.
"Linux" is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Sponsored in part by:
PC Memory Store
PC Memory Store donated give-aways to LUGOD in early 2008.