l i n u x - u s e r s - g r o u p - o f - d a v i s
Next Meeting:
July 7: Social gathering
Next Installfest:
Latest News:
Jun. 14: June LUGOD meeting cancelled
Page last updated:
2001 Dec 30 17:07

The following is an archive of a post made to our 'vox-tech mailing list' by one of its subscribers.

Report this post as spam:

(Enter your email address)
Re: [vox-tech] Win2k and Linux Dual Boot
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vox-tech] Win2k and Linux Dual Boot

No offense taken.I   was just further explaining what I did. Thanks for the 
					John Verderber

On Tuesday 24 July 2001 06:57 pm, you wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, John Verderber wrote:
> > I understand you concerns with the NTloder boot. And I need to qualify my
> > letter. I ALWAYS have a dos partition when using NT or W2K at the
> > beginning of the disk. I find it a good way ito get in if the system
> > screws up. Also some of my hardware is configuarble with DOS utilities.
> > And admittedly I didnt have access to the NTFS filesystem in linux. But I
> > did hav a FAT32 partition available. So I did qualify my proceedures, and
> > Admittedly it was not on a production server, just my own.
> Heya John,
> If this is a coment to my statement on some of the problems with the
> ntboot loader, I'd like to re-state that I have used your method before,
> and found it to be useful in a few places. :-) (How can I claim it is
> wrong or bad if I have been known to use it as well?)
> In *no* way was I saying that it was a wrong thing to do. One of the
> beutiful things about Linux is that it allows us to solve the same problem
> with many techniques.
> Use of a C: that is dos based with FAT-16/32, can be good for repairs and
> fixes (even noted in Mark Minasi's book on NT), but a risk is security and
> another risk is an inability to share the C: with NT AppleShare. Of
> course, if AppleShare is not necessary for the admin, and the admin
> rightly feels that physical access = ability to comprimise the system
> anyway, then why not have a dos based C: ? (Not trying to settle that
> arguement.)
> Just like the above, I think it is really a matter of taste on how we all
> solve problems.
> Sorry if I offended,
> -ME
> Version: 3.12
> GCS/CM$/IT$/LS$/S/O$ !d--(++) !s !a+++(-----) C++$(++++) U++++$(+$) P+$>+++
> L+++$(++) E W+++$(+) N+ o K w+$>++>+++ O-@ M+$ V-$>- !PS !PE Y+ !PGP
> t@-(++) 5+@ X@ R- tv- b++ DI+++ D+ G--@ e+>++>++++ h(++)>+ r*>? z?
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> decode: http://www.ebb.org/ungeek/ about: http://www.geekcode.com/geek.html
>      Systems Department Operating Systems Analyst for the SSU Library

LUGOD Group on LinkedIn
Sign up for LUGOD event announcements
Your email address:
LUGOD Group on Facebook
'Like' LUGOD on Facebook:

Hosting provided by:
Sunset Systems
Sunset Systems offers preconfigured Linux systems, remote system administration and custom software development.

LUGOD: Linux Users' Group of Davis
PO Box 2082, Davis, CA 95617
Contact Us

LUGOD is a 501(c)7 non-profit organization
based in Davis, California
and serving the Sacramento area.
"Linux" is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Sponsored in part by:
O'Reilly and Associates
For numerous book donations.